Link copied 
A storm of disagreement has yet again swept over billionaire business tycoon Mark Cuban and former Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) heavyweight John Reed Stark. The bone of contention is a widespread debate over the fundamental reasons behind FTX's spectacular downfall and the resultant loss for its creditors.
Mark Cuban maintains a strong stance that the inadequate regulatory environment fostered by the SEC has been instrumental in leading to the calamity. He emphasized that had clear-cut regulations been in place, the collapse of FTX could have been averted, thereby saving the stakeholders from massive financial damage.
Earlier, Stark expressed his concerns over the cryptocurrency industry. He highlighted the absence of consumer protection, regulatory supervision, and audits as critical flaws. Further, he opined that cryptocurrencies, including central bank digital currencies and stablecoins, add no real value or solutions. Stark singled out Japanese regulators for their progressive Web3-friendly policies, countering Cuban's praise of them.
Cuban challenged Stark's skepticism with a counter-argument that the meltdown of FTX in Japan didn't result in any financial loss. In stark contrast, Stark doubted the logic in blaming the SEC for the failures of multiple cryptocurrency platforms, including Terra, Celsius, BlockFi, and Voyager, referring to them as "dumpster fires."
The former SEC official didn't shy away from admitting that the SEC isn't infallible. Nevertheless, he credited the institution for saving crypto investors from potentially massive losses. Stark argued that the crypto industry's frequent lawsuits against the SEC each time a new regulation is proposed or enacted demonstrate the industry's reluctance to operate within a regulatory framework.
In a previous encounter, Cuban called out the SEC for failing to offer a lucid registration process to crypto firms, pointing to ambiguities in determining what amounts to security.
