2 min read
Add as a preferred source on Google

Six Crypto Trading Front Ends Each Earned More Than $1 Million in 30 Days

The six-platform comparison is dated Oct. 21, while the wallet figures cover a separate 30-day period ending Oct. 22.

Mentioned assets
Six glass panels face a single stone counter / TokenPost.ai
Six glass panels face a single stone counter / TokenPost.ai

Six crypto trading front ends each generated more than $1 million in 30-day revenue as wallets and apps expand into trading services, shifting more revenue toward the customer-facing layer.

The six products were Fomo, Axiom, GMGN, Phantom, MetaMask and Trust Wallet. They put an app interface over trading services built on existing protocols, bringing users into a platform without requiring it to build every part of the trading system. Third-party front ends’ share of perpetual futures trading was less than 1% in early 2025 and about 20% in August 2026.

The six-platform comparison is dated Oct. 21. Wallet revenue figures cover a separate 30-day period ending Oct. 22. Phantom generated more than $7 million in that period, with about $1.2 million from contract trading. Most of its revenue still came from wallet swaps and cross-chain activity.

MetaMask generated about $3.72 million, including roughly $2.23 million from wallet trading and $1.29 million from Hyperliquid contract trading. Those two listed categories total about $3.52 million and do not explain the full stated revenue. Trust Wallet generated about $1.93 million; Hyperliquid perpetuals contributed $1.56 million, while other wallet services, including swaps and cross-chain transactions, accounted for about $370,000.

Fomo’s model centers on social trading. Users can follow other traders, and creators can receive part of the fees generated by follower trades.

Axiom and GMGN focus on memecoin trading but have broadened their products. Axiom expanded beyond Solana to BNB Chain, Base and Ink. GMGN added perpetual futures and social features.

Wallets bring existing asset holders, trading terminals serve users who already trade actively, and social apps can draw on creators and followers. Those starting points differ, but adding more services lets each app try to capture more activity from its own audience. The increase in third-party perpetual trading share suggests the customer interface has become an important point of competition alongside trading protocols themselves.

John Kim

John Kim reports on the digital-asset business for TokenPost. Send corrections or tips to info@tokenpost.com.

Loading…