Bitcoin’s Three Midterm Election Results Show Mixed Outcomes
Bitcoin gained over the 12 months after the 2014, 2018 and 2022 elections but fell sharply in the first month after 2018.

Bitcoin’s performance in the 12 months after the 2014, 2018 and 2022 midterm elections varied widely, offering limited evidence that the voting cycle alone determines its market direction.
Bitcoin gained 24.5% in the 12 months after the 2014 midterms, 44.9% after the 2018 elections and 92.3% after the 2022 vote. The cryptocurrency also dropped 45.5% during the first month after the 2018 election, highlighting the gap between short-term volatility and longer measurement periods.
The three-election record is too limited to establish a lasting pattern. Bitcoin’s price and active addresses have also moved independently. Active addresses do not represent individual investors and do not directly measure demand for spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds.
U.S. stock-market history provides a separate reference point. The S&P 500 rose in all 19 12-month periods following midterm elections since 1950, with an average gain of 15.4%. The third year of a presidential term has tended to be the strongest period for stocks, while lower political uncertainty may encourage risk-taking.
That historical pattern does not establish causation or provide a forecast for Bitcoin. Broader financial conditions and regulatory developments remain relevant to the market outlook.
The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield stood at 5.28% on Oct. 2. A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act failed in September, leaving the bill’s regulatory progress unresolved.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $241.1 million in net inflows from Sept. 28 to Oct. 2. Market conditions may be influenced by whether Treasury yields stabilize, ETF inflows continue and regulatory progress materializes.
The post-midterm figures provide historical context, but Bitcoin’s three-election record does not support a reliable directional conclusion.