The Digital Chamber (TDC), a leading cryptocurrency advocacy organization, has filed a lawsuit challenging Illinois' newly approved Digital Asset Tax Act, arguing that the measure violates both the U.S. Constitution and the Illinois Constitution. The complaint, filed in federal court on Tuesday, seeks to block state officials from enforcing the new crypto tax before it takes effect in January.
The disputed legislation, passed during the final days of Illinois' legislative session, imposes a 0.2% tax on certain digital asset transactions. The tax applies to businesses headquartered in Illinois or companies offering services in the state with more than $100,000 in gross receipts.
According to the lawsuit, the Digital Asset Tax Act unfairly targets blockchain-based transactions while treating traditional financial infrastructure differently. TDC argues the law violates the Illinois Constitution's uniformity and due process clauses, as well as the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The group also claims the tax conflicts with the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act, which prohibits discriminatory taxation of electronic commerce.
The complaint contends that the legislation does not account for whether a transaction generates a profit or loss, whether gains are realized or unrealized, or whether ownership of an asset actually changes. Instead, the lawsuit argues, the law focuses solely on whether blockchain technology is used to record or process the transaction.
TDC further maintains that federal law distinguishes digital assets based on the assets themselves rather than the technology used to record ownership. The organization argues that no comparable legal framework imposes different tax treatment based solely on the infrastructure supporting a financial transaction.
Filed on behalf of its members, the lawsuit asks the court to declare the Illinois Digital Asset Tax Act unconstitutional under both state and federal law. The group is also seeking an injunction preventing Illinois from implementing the tax when it is scheduled to take effect in January, along with reimbursement for legal fees and other court costs.
The case could become a closely watched legal battle for the cryptocurrency industry, as its outcome may influence how other states approach the taxation of digital asset transactions and blockchain-based financial services.
Comment 0