Tokenized Finance Struggles With Fragmented Networks and Thin Liquidity
An early-release IMF chapter says tokenization could speed settlement and expand access, but uncertain legal rights and faster risk transmission limit adoption.

Tokenized finance could shorten settlement, support fractional ownership and enable continuous trading, but fragmented networks, thin liquidity and uncertain legal rights continue to limit adoption.
An early-release chapter from the International Monetary Fund’s October 2026 financial stability analysis examines how programmable digital ledgers could combine trading, settlement, payment and compliance functions. The chapter was released at 1 a.m. ET (05:00 UTC) on Oct. 8. The full report is dated Oct. 12.
Tokenization represents financial assets and liabilities digitally on programmable ledgers. The structure could reduce reconciliation work and settlement delays while allowing markets to operate continuously.
The main obstacle is the lack of infrastructure connecting separate networks. Liquidity can become divided across isolated systems, while uncertainty over legal ownership and settlement finality can discourage institutional participation.
Faster settlement also creates new risks. Delays in traditional markets can give participants time to manage liquidity and assess potential losses. Instant, always-on transactions could remove those buffers and allow leverage, forced selling and liquidity stress to spread more quickly.
Broader adoption depends on legal certainty, safe settlement assets, code governance and international coordination. These conditions are intended to establish confidence that a digital token represents an enforceable claim and that transactions will settle reliably.
“Tokenization constitutes a structural shift in financial architecture rather than a marginal efficiency improvement,” Tobias Adrian wrote in an April 2026 note.
The latest analysis builds on an earlier examination of tokenized U.S. equity products. That analysis found that tokenized markets remain small and had weaker liquidity than comparable traditional markets, while fractional trading and activity outside regular U.S. market hours were common.