2 min read
Add as a preferred source on Google

Direct-to-Consumer Paycheck-Advance Borrowers Paid $208 a Year in Fees and Tips

Fees or tips appeared on 96% of loans in a direct-to-consumer sample covering September 2024 through August 2025.

A phone and debit card sit beneath curled calendar pages / TokenPost.ai
A phone and debit card sit beneath curled calendar pages / TokenPost.ai

Direct-to-consumer paycheck-advance apps carried an average $207.85 in annual fees and tips per borrower, while fees or tips appeared on 96% of loans in a U.S. transaction sample covering September 2024 through August 2025.

The average advance was $113.31 for nine days and cost $6.49 in fees. Annualizing the average advance’s nine-day cost produced an illustrative APR of 232%; it does not represent the amount borrowers paid in a year.

The national sample covered 9,987 borrowers, while a broader screen identified 346,902 app borrowers. The sample may not represent users across the market. Some advances or repayments routed through in-app wallets or accounts outside the observed bank data may also be missing.

Frequent borrowers accounted for most of the direct-to-consumer fees and tips: those taking 25 or more advances a year accounted for 82% of the charges. Across direct-to-consumer and employer-linked services, borrowers took an average of 33 advances a year, and 42% of advances were below $100.

Direct-to-consumer services estimate wages earned and typically collect repayment from a bank account. Employer-linked services use payroll information and generally collect repayment through payroll. Costs for the employer-linked services were not calculated because payroll deductions and related fees generally were not visible in the bank transactions.

A separate 2022 estimate put the number of workers using both types of service at roughly 10 million, with $31.9 billion in advances that year. That estimate covers both types and does not establish a current user count.

In December 2025, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) withdrew a proposed interpretive rule from 2024 and issued an advisory opinion on qualifying earned-wage-access products. The opinion says products meeting its criteria are not credit under the Truth in Lending Act. It also says a bona fide voluntary tip is not a finance charge, while an effectively imposed fee may count. The opinion is guidance and has no force or effect of law outside the federal government.

Riza Dagoc

Riza Dagoc reports on regulation, investing and the digital-asset business for TokenPost. Send corrections or tips to info@tokenpost.com.

Loading…